Page 167 - Carte Falimentul BIR
P. 167

carried out regarding the nomination of magistrate Negru Cristina, "in order to
               solve a petition for legal action, which did not exist in the Court Ledger". Under
               these circumstances, it was established that the magistrate was not nominated for
               the case, in accordance with the legal provisions (the address of the Commercial
               Section of the Bucharest Court and the report the Court of First Instance, on the
               Part II and III of File No 5615/2000).

               The provisions stipulated in  the two special laws (Law  No. 64/1995 and
               Emergency Government  Ordinance no 186/1999) are  mandatory provisions
               regarding the competence of magistrates in the case of the reorganization and
               bankruptcy procedures of commercial companies.


                                                 th
               By the resolution on June 29  2000 of a non-existing request in a lawsuit, the
               magistrate Cristina Negru, who was not invested in judging the petition and did
               not attend the court, performed  the first procedural act, by quoting the parties.


               Article 5 of the Civil Code states that:

                "Laws on the interest to public order and good morals cannot be derogated by
               conventions or particular provisions",

               Therefore, the jurisdiction of courts and magistrates is a matter of public order.


                              th
               4. On July 10  2000, through Sentence no. 4461/2000, provided in File no. 5615/
               12.03.2000 (????) when the BNR request did not even exist, the same magistrate,
               Negru Cristina - without having the competence required by the law - activated
               the bankruptcy procedure of BIR,  on the basis of a petition for a lawsuit that was
               not registered before at the court.


               Although by BIR appeal it was requested to have specialized expertise, the
               objection of unconstitutionality of GEO no. 186/1999 being  mentioned, the
               magistrate Negru Cristina rejected the BIR requests and initiated the bankruptcy
               procedure.

               In  the  sentence,  Magistrate  Negru  Cristina,  not  legally  invested  in  this  case,
               by  misinterpreting the truth, and thus lying, shows that the National Bank of
               Romania  is the creditor of the International Bank of Religions, which is
               absolutely unreal, since BIR has never borrowed any money from the BNR .


               Also, the magistrate, Negru Cristina, indicates that BIR is in the payments
               cessation, without mentioning which were the 30 days granted according to the
               law,  in which no payments were made; in fact, BIR made payments until July
                  th
               27  2000, when the group of liquidators forced the bank's leadership to leave and
               occupied its offices by force.




                                                           165
   162   163   164   165   166   167   168   169   170   171   172