Page 154 - Carte Falimentul BIR
P. 154

the  Commission for Abuse  Research and Anti-Corruption  of the Chamber of
               Deputies).

                                          st
               Therefore, on January 1  2000, the BIR indicators could not lead to the idea of
               initiating bankruptcy proceeding because there were no conditions stipulated by
               the law amended by GEO no. 186/1999.


               Nevertheless, BNR continued to make a heavy blow to the bank by issuing Norm
               no. 1/ 24.01.2001 that,  contrary to the  provisions of art. 115 of the  Law no.
               58/1998 on banking activity, imposed a devastating measure on the bank itself,
               namely:

               "The establishment of a special regime for the discount settlement of payments

               and receipts operations".

               If it had complied with the provision of art. 115 of the Law no. 58/1998, the BNR
               could have ordered "the introduction of the special administration measure", that
               did not meet the BNR's interest in bankruptcy of the bank.

               It is obvious that, by imposing "special administration", the BNR premeditated
               and excluded the possibility of rescuing the bank from bankruptcy because it
               knew with certainty that enforcing the "special discount settlement regime" was
               a safe way to bankruptcy.


               This is one of the undisputable  evidence that the BNR has premeditated the
               bankruptcy of the International Bank of Religions.


                                th
               On January 15  2000, a so-called "routine control" was initiated at BIR, by the
               BNR Deputy Governor Mihai Bogza's  decision. Such a previous control was
               concluded only a few months before, namely in October 1999.

               On January 28  2000, the BNR leadership issued Circular no. 6, which, at point
                                th
               7, provides that:


                "The claims made by banks in 1999 were to be registered as loss."

               The only bank in the system that had executed such assignments in 1999, in fact
               according to the provisions of the Civil Code and the Commercial Code, was the
               International Bank of Religions.


               By obviously violating the constitutional principle of the law's non-retroactivity
               (Article  15  paragraph  2  of  the  Romanian  Constitution),  the  BNR  unlawfully
               obliged BIR to apply this Circular retroactively, for the 1999 financial year,
               which had just ended.





                                                           152
   149   150   151   152   153   154   155   156   157   158   159